linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] csiostor: Fix backwards locking in the function __csio_unreg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160406193413.GE7369@thunk.org>
Date:	Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:34:13 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Bastien Philbert <bastienphilbert@...il.com>,
	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] csiostor: Fix backwards locking in the function
 __csio_unreg_rnode

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:41:49AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > Is this Nick Krause?  An email reply that Martin forwarded but the 
> > > > list didn't pick up (because it had a html part) suggests this. 
> > > >  What you're doing is what got you banned from LKML the last time: 
> > > > sending patches without evidence there's a problem or understanding 
> > > > the code you're patching.  Repeating the behaviour under a new 
> > > > identity isn't going to help improve your standing.
> > > > 
> > > No I am not Nick Krause. I am just aware of how he got banned a few 
> > > years ago. That email was a mistake by typo and was hoping nobody 
> > > picked it up as they would then believe I was Nick Krause.
> > 
> > Hm, OK, but currently you are repeating his behaviour ... please don't
> > send any more patches until they're about real problems backed by
> > actual data.
> 
> He's Nick, look at the email headers for proof.
> 
> James, and everyone else, please drop his patches.  I'll go get him
> banned from vger again.
> 
> Nick, please stop, you have violated the DCO now, a much worse thing
> than before.

Even if Bastien is going to try to claim that he happens to live in
the same house as Nick, the following two patches clearly shows that
even if Bastien is violating the DCO by using a fake sock puppet, he's
violated the DCO by failing to give Nick credit for writing the
identical patch.

						- Ted


Download attachment "evidence.gz" of type "application/gzip" (7182 bytes)