linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/15] dmaengine: dw: fix master selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VfdqzcuUquRKfWK4mosHDHR08RXH0MRodWJNFwMi3NcLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Apr 2016 22:56:34 +0300
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/15] dmaengine: dw: fix master selection

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:10:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 10:03 -0700, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > >
>> > > + /*
>> > > +  * We need controller-specific data to set up slave
>> > > transfers.
>> > > +  */
>> > > + BUG_ON(chan->private && !dw_dma_filter(chan, chan-
>> > > >private));
>> > I don't think BUG_ON is apt here, gracefully failing and printing
>> > that can
>> > be better..
>>
>> Hm, this is coming from the existing code.
>>
>> I would prefer to keep this one as is since it's targeted to stable@,
>> and I may issue sequential patch to replace BUG_ON. Sounds okay?
>
> But since this is going stable, how about we remove here in the patch and
> benefit stable tree as well?

I'm fine with that. I will send you patch tomorrow.Other than that do
we have any issues with the rest?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko