[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3485892.5WC9EhQffY@phil>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:38:37 -0700
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: kishon@...com
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, ykk@...k-chips.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] phy: rockchip-dp: should be a child device of the GRF
Hi Kishon,
Am Donnerstag, 24. März 2016, 22:29:01 schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
> The displayport-phy is fully enclosed in the general register files (GRF).
> Therefore as seen from the device-tree it shouldn't be a separate
> platform- device but instead a sub-device of the GRF - using the
> simply-mfd mechanism.
>
> The driver entered the kernel in the current merge-window, so we can still
> adapt the binding without needing a fallback, as the binding hasn't been
> released with a full kernel yet.
>
> While the edp phy is fully part of the GRF, it doesn't have any separate
> register set there, so doesn't get any register-area assigned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
could you please look at taking these patches into the 4.6-rc kernel as fixes
please. I'd really like to not having to keep the old interface around and
currently we still can just convert without keeping backward compatibility.
Thanks
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists