linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for cpufreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:58:20 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for
 cpufreq_suspended set

On 07-04-16, 03:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Since governor operations are generally skipped if cpufreq_suspended
> is set, do nothing at all in cpufreq_start_governor() and
> cpufreq_exit_governor() in that case.
> 
> In particular, this prevents fast frequency switching from being
> disabled after a suspend-to-RAM cycle on all CPUs except for the
> boot one.

static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event)
{
	int ret;

	/* Don't start any governor operations if we are entering suspend */
	if (cpufreq_suspended)
		return 0;

        ...

}

Above already guarantees that we would start/stop governors. Why do we
need this change then ?


-- 
viresh