linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Improvement, fix and new entry for dwc3 debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87zit6ypnx.fsf@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Apr 2016 08:05:22 +0300
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To:	changbin.du@...el.com
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Du\, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Improvement, fix and new entry for dwc3 debugfs


Hi,

before I review your patches, one comment

changbin.du@...el.com writes:
> From: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>
>
> The first patch removed unnecessary checking for debugfs api call;
> The second patch fix a memory leak issue;
> The third patch add one new entry to debufs.
>
> Du, Changbin (3):
>   usb: dwc3: make dwc3_debugfs_init return value be void

this is _not_ a fix

>   usb: dwc3: free dwc->regset on dwc3_debugfs_exit

but this is. Why isn't this, at least, the first patch in the list ? In
fact, it would be preferred that this patch be sent by itself and the
following two patches should be on another branch completely without any
dependencies to the memory leak fix.

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (819 bytes)