[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnbY+co6YLXANfeMnfBOBs8Ba_Sbdqz0Ahm8RzAhRF7MrxL4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:27:08 +1000
From: Daurnimator <quae@...rnimator.com>
To: linux-net@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: bindat/connectat syscalls
Related thread (2012): https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=133897212713981&w=2
FreeBSD[1] chose signatures of:
int bindat(int fd, int s, const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t addrlen);
int connectat(int fd, int s, const struct sockaddr *name,
socklen_t namelen);
An alternate implementation could instead augment `sockaddr_un`.
Also, if we're going to add a new bind and connect() syscalls, we
should also add a flags argument.
(Please CC on reply)
[1] https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=bindat&sektion=2
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=connectat&sektion=2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists