[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29817.1460019686@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:01:26 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IMA: Use the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok (update)
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Please feel free to squash this patch with yours of the same name (12/12).
>
> Just replace the .ima_mok keyring with the .secondary_trusted_keys.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Okay, I've squashed it and am posting a new set. How do you want your changes
attributing to you?
Do you have any objections to my patch set beginning:
[RFC PATCH 0/7] KEYS: Adjust public key signature handling
also at:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=keys-sig
upon which the trusted patches are based?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists