Message-ID: <57062976.8090900@linaro.org>
Date:	Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:33:42 +0200
From:	Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
To:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:	eric.auger@...com, robin.murphy@....com, will.deacon@....com,
	joro@...tes.org, tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
	marc.zyngier@....com, christoffer.dall@...aro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com,
	patches@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Manish.Jaggi@...iumnetworks.com, Bharat.Bhushan@...escale.com,
	pranav.sawargaonkar@...il.com, p.fedin@...sung.com,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Jean-Philippe.Brucker@....com,
	julien.grall@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] dma-reserved-iommu: iommu_get/put_single_reserved

Alex,
On 04/07/2016 01:12 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon,  4 Apr 2016 08:07:01 +0000
> Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
>> This patch introduces iommu_get/put_single_reserved.
>>
>> iommu_get_single_reserved allows to allocate a new reserved iova page
>> and map it onto the physical page that contains a given physical address.
>> Page size is the IOMMU page one. It is the responsability of the
>> system integrator to make sure the in use IOMMU page size corresponds
>> to the granularity of the MSI frame.
>>
>> It returns the iova that is mapped onto the provided physical address.
>> Hence the physical address passed in argument does not need to be aligned.
>>
>> In case a mapping already exists between both pages, the IOVA mapped
>> to the PA is directly returned.
>>
>> Each time an iova is successfully returned a binding ref count is
>> incremented.
>>
>> iommu_put_single_reserved decrements the ref count and when this latter
>> is null, the mapping is destroyed and the iova is released.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Jindal <ajindal@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <Bharat.Bhushan@...escale.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> v5 -> v6:
>> - revisit locking with spin_lock instead of mutex
>> - do not kref_get on 1st get
>> - add size parameter to the get function following Marc's request
>> - use the iova domain shift instead of using the smallest supported page size
>>
>> v3 -> v4:
>> - formerly in iommu: iommu_get/put_single_reserved &
>>   iommu/arm-smmu: implement iommu_get/put_single_reserved
>> - Attempted to address Marc's doubts about missing size/alignment
>>   at VFIO level (user-space knows the IOMMU page size and the number
>>   of IOVA pages to provision)
>>
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - remove static implementation of iommu_get_single_reserved &
>>   iommu_put_single_reserved when CONFIG_IOMMU_API is not set
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - previously a VFIO API, named vfio_alloc_map/unmap_free_reserved_iova
>> ---
>>  drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/dma-reserved-iommu.h |  28 +++++++
>>  2 files changed, 174 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
>> index f592118..3c759d9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
>> @@ -136,3 +136,149 @@ void iommu_free_reserved_iova_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->reserved_lock, flags);
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_free_reserved_iova_domain);
>> +
>> +static void delete_reserved_binding(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> +				    struct iommu_reserved_binding *b)
>> +{
>> +	struct iova_domain *iovad =
>> +		(struct iova_domain *)domain->reserved_iova_cookie;
>> +	unsigned long order = iova_shift(iovad);
>> +
>> +	iommu_unmap(domain, b->iova, b->size);
>> +	free_iova(iovad, b->iova >> order);
>> +	kfree(b);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int iommu_get_reserved_iova(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> +			      phys_addr_t addr, size_t size, int prot,
>> +			      dma_addr_t *iova)
>> +{
>> +	struct iova_domain *iovad =
>> +		(struct iova_domain *)domain->reserved_iova_cookie;
>> +	unsigned long order = iova_shift(iovad);
>> +	unsigned long  base_pfn, end_pfn, nb_iommu_pages;
>> +	size_t iommu_page_size = 1 << order, binding_size;
>> +	phys_addr_t aligned_base, offset;
>> +	struct iommu_reserved_binding *b, *newb;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +	struct iova *p_iova;
>> +	bool unmap = false;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	base_pfn = addr >> order;
>> +	end_pfn = (addr + size - 1) >> order;
>> +	nb_iommu_pages = end_pfn - base_pfn + 1;
>> +	aligned_base = base_pfn << order;
>> +	offset = addr - aligned_base;
>> +	binding_size = nb_iommu_pages * iommu_page_size;
>> +
>> +	if (!iovad)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->reserved_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	b = find_reserved_binding(domain, aligned_base, binding_size);
>> +	if (b) {
>> +		*iova = b->iova + offset;
>> +		kref_get(&b->kref);
>> +		ret = 0;
>> +		goto unlock;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->reserved_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * no reserved IOVA was found for this PA, start allocating and
>> +	 * registering one while the spin-lock is not held. iommu_map/unmap
>> +	 * are not supposed to be atomic
>> +	 */
>> +
>> +	p_iova = alloc_iova(iovad, nb_iommu_pages, iovad->dma_32bit_pfn, true);
>> +	if (!p_iova)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> Here we're using iovad, which was the reserved_iova_cookie outside of
> the locking, which makes the locking ineffective.  Isn't this lock also
> protecting our iova domain, I'm confused.
I think I was too when I wrote that :-(
> 
>> +
>> +	*iova = iova_dma_addr(iovad, p_iova);
>> +
>> +	newb = kzalloc(sizeof(*b), GFP_KERNEL);
needs to to be GPF_ATOMIC as Jean-Philippe stated before.
>> +	if (!newb) {
>> +		free_iova(iovad, p_iova->pfn_lo);
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = iommu_map(domain, *iova, aligned_base, binding_size, prot);
one problem I have is I would need iommu_map to be atomic (because of
the call sequence reported by Jean-Philippe) and I have no guarantee it
is in general I think . It is for arm-smmu(-v3).c which covers the ARM
use case. But what about other smmus potentially used in that process?

Thanks
Eric
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		kfree(newb);
>> +		free_iova(iovad, p_iova->pfn_lo);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->reserved_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	/* re-check the PA was not mapped in our back when lock was not held */
>> +	b = find_reserved_binding(domain, aligned_base, binding_size);
>> +	if (b) {
>> +		*iova = b->iova + offset;
>> +		kref_get(&b->kref);
>> +		ret = 0;
>> +		unmap = true;
>> +		goto unlock;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	kref_init(&newb->kref);
>> +	newb->domain = domain;
>> +	newb->addr = aligned_base;
>> +	newb->iova = *iova;
>> +	newb->size = binding_size;
>> +
>> +	link_reserved_binding(domain, newb);
>> +
>> +	*iova += offset;
>> +	goto unlock;
> 
> ??
> 
>> +
>> +unlock:
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->reserved_lock, flags);
>> +	if (unmap)
>> +		delete_reserved_binding(domain, newb);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_get_reserved_iova);
>> +
>> +void iommu_put_reserved_iova(struct iommu_domain *domain, dma_addr_t iova)
>> +{
>> +	struct iova_domain *iovad =
>> +		(struct iova_domain *)domain->reserved_iova_cookie;
>> +	unsigned long order;
>> +	phys_addr_t aligned_addr;
>> +	dma_addr_t aligned_iova, page_size, mask, offset;
>> +	struct iommu_reserved_binding *b;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +	bool unmap = false;
>> +
>> +	order = iova_shift(iovad);
>> +	page_size = (uint64_t)1 << order;
>> +	mask = page_size - 1;
>> +
>> +	aligned_iova = iova & ~mask;
>> +	offset = iova - aligned_iova;
>> +
>> +	aligned_addr = iommu_iova_to_phys(domain, aligned_iova);
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->reserved_lock, flags);
>> +	b = find_reserved_binding(domain, aligned_addr, page_size);
>> +	if (!b)
>> +		goto unlock;
>> +
>> +	if (atomic_sub_and_test(1, &b->kref.refcount)) {
>> +		unlink_reserved_binding(domain, b);
>> +		unmap = true;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +unlock:
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->reserved_lock, flags);
>> +	if (unmap)
>> +		delete_reserved_binding(domain, b);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_put_reserved_iova);
>> +
>> +
>> +
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-reserved-iommu.h b/include/linux/dma-reserved-iommu.h
>> index 5bf863b..dedea56 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dma-reserved-iommu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-reserved-iommu.h
>> @@ -40,6 +40,34 @@ int iommu_alloc_reserved_iova_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>>   */
>>  void iommu_free_reserved_iova_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain);
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * iommu_get_reserved_iova: allocate a contiguous set of iova pages and
>> + * map them to the physical range defined by @addr and @size.
>> + *
>> + * @domain: iommu domain handle
>> + * @addr: physical address to bind
>> + * @size: size of the binding
>> + * @prot: mapping protection attribute
>> + * @iova: returned iova
>> + *
>> + * Mapped physical pfns are within [@addr >> order, (@addr + size -1) >> order]
>> + * where order corresponds to the iova domain order.
>> + * This mapping is reference counted as a whole and cannot by split.
>> + */
>> +int iommu_get_reserved_iova(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> +			      phys_addr_t addr, size_t size, int prot,
>> +			      dma_addr_t *iova);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iommu_put_reserved_iova: decrement a ref count of the reserved mapping
>> + *
>> + * @domain: iommu domain handle
>> + * @iova: reserved iova whose binding ref count is decremented
>> + *
>> + * if the binding ref count is null, destroy the reserved mapping
>> + */
>> +void iommu_put_reserved_iova(struct iommu_domain *domain, dma_addr_t iova);
>> +
>>  #endif	/* CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA_RESERVED */
>>  #endif	/* __KERNEL__ */
>>  #endif	/* __DMA_RESERVED_IOMMU_H */
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists