[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57065FB5.6040707@parkeon.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:25:09 +0200
From: Martin Fuzzey <mfuzzey@...keon.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Regulator: drivers that need to know their supply
Hi,
I am working on a driver for the tps22993 load switch.
This chip has configurable slew rates but no voltage setting
(as it's just a switch).
To implement the .enable_time() method I need the voltage (which is
the supply's voltage).
The problem is that, when my regulator is configured as always-on the
supply is not known when .enable_time() is called from regulator_register()
(it does work if the regulator is not always-on)
This is similar to the problem fixed by
5e3ca2b349b1 regulator: Try to resolve regulators supplies on
registration
and the follow up deadlock fix.
I tried adding a new function:
struct regulator *rdev_get_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
{
int rc;
rc = regulator_resolve_supply(rdev);
if (rc)
return ERR_PTR(rc);
return rdev->supply;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rdev_get_supply);
Unfortunately that doesn't work.
First of all supply_name is not set at that point
(since it is set in regulator_register() AFTER set_machine_constraints())
Even after swapping the call order in regulator_register() it still doesn't
work for my configuration since the parent supply is probed later
so rdev_get_supply() returns -EDEFER which just results in
a warning message from _regulator_do_enable() when it propagates
back from .enable_time()
3V3_LCD: enable_time() failed: -517
And even without that problem there is a risk of another
deadlock since the driver callbacks are called from
regulator_register() with the regulator_list mutex held
in the always_on case.
Any ideas how to do this?
Regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists