[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5705B9BD.1020403@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:37:01 +0800
From: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@...wei.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <sstabellini@...nel.org>
CC: <david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
<peter.huangpeng@...wei.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/17] Xen: ARM: Add support for mapping platform
device mmio
On 2016/4/6 20:16, Julien Grall wrote:
>> + gpfns[j] = XEN_PFN_DOWN(r->start) + j;
>> + idxs[j] = XEN_PFN_DOWN(r->start) + j;
>> + }
>> +
>> + xatp.domid = DOMID_SELF;
>> + xatp.size = nr;
>> + xatp.space = XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio;
>> +
>> + set_xen_guest_handle(xatp.gpfns, gpfns);
>> + set_xen_guest_handle(xatp.idxs, idxs);
>> + set_xen_guest_handle(xatp.errs, errs);
>> +
>> + rc = HYPERVISOR_memory_op(XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range, &xatp);
>> + kfree(gpfns);
>> + kfree(idxs);
>> + kfree(errs);
>> + if (rc)
>> + return rc;
>
> Shouldn't we redo the mapping if the hypercall fails?
Hmm, why? If it fails again when we redo the mapping, what should we do
then? Redo again?
I think if it fails at the first time it will always fail no matter how
many times we do.
Thanks,
--
Shannon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists