[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160407151017.3d8b1a86@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:10:17 +0100
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: zengzhaoxiu@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, dvlasenk@...hat.com, bp@...e.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dvyukov@...gle.com,
keescook@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/30] Add x86-specific parity functions
On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:45:27 -0700
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> zengzhaoxiu@....com writes:
>
> > From: Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com>
> >
> > Use alternatives, lifted from arch_hweight
>
> Is there actually anything performance critical in the kernel that uses
> parity?
On very low end devices some of the flash, but the implementation here is
ironically pretty much worst-case for such x86 devices 8)
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists