lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 10:25:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com> cc: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>, Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>, <pali.rohar@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: f_mass_storage: test whether thread is running before starting another On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: > Sounds good to me. I’d love someone to test this patch (I sadly have no > way of doing that at the moment) and with that I can resend it with > updated message. Ivaylo should be able to try it. > > BTW, is configfs capable of adding a single instance twice in different > > configs? Or is that again something only legacy gadgets can do? > > I don’t think so. I might be wrong though, but here’s configuration > from the original post: > > mkdir functions/mass_storage.0 > echo $file > functions/mass_storage.0/lun.0/file > ln -s functions/mass_storage.0 configs/c.1 > ln -s functions/mass_storage.0 configs/c.2 > > This makes me suspect it’s not possible to link a function instance to > the same configuration twice, but now that I think about it, I’m not > quite sure what would happen if one did: > > ln -s functions/mass_storage.0 configs/c.1/foo > ln -s functions/mass_storage.0 configs/c.1/bar Do you think it would be worthwhile to check for this possibility in the driver and report an error? Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists