[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160407.122124.1542811219982329414.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:21:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: vegard.nossum@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
sasha.levin@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mark DECnet as broken
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:01:20 +0100
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:22:43 +0200
> Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>> There are NULL pointer dereference bugs in DECnet which can be triggered
>> by unprivileged users and have been reported multiple times to LKML,
>> however nobody seems confident enough in the proposed fixes to merge them
>> and the consensus seems to be that nobody cares enough about DECnet to
>> see it fixed anyway.
>>
>> To shield unsuspecting users from the possible DOS, we should mark this
>> BROKEN until somebody who actually uses this code can fix it.
>
> How about consigning it to staging at this point ?
Staging is a one way facility in my opinion.
I saw we just fix the NULL dereference.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists