| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAOg9mSSH0NanfUt17HpnoMRo4pCUE1OijcT7jqyRr1h06rzr5A@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:43:28 -0400 From: Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com> To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> Cc: Martin Brandenburg <martin@...ibond.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] orangefs: strncpy -> strlcpy It looks like strscpy went in last October... there are no users of it yet. I was just about to send in a pull request that includes Martin's strncpy->strlcpy patch when I saw Andy's comment. Linus said when he pulled strscpy: > So I'm pulling the strscpy() support because it *is* a better interface. > But I will refuse to pull mindless conversion patches. Use this in > places where it makes sense, but don't do trivial patches to fix things > that aren't actually known to be broken. Maybe it makes sense for our strncpy->strlcpy patch to be a strscpy patch instead? Maybe our strncpy->strlcpy patch is itself a "mindless conversion patch"? (I don't think so)... I'll wait until tomorrow, and then send my pull request as it is, unless everyone chimes in and says "use strscpy!"... -Mike On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Martin Brandenburg <martin@...ibond.com> wrote: >> From: Martin Brandenburg <martin@...ibond.com> >> >> Almost everywhere we use strncpy we should use strlcpy. This affects >> path names (d_name mostly), symlink targets, and server names. >> >> Leave debugfs code as is for now, though it could use a review as well. >> > > |Why not strscpy() as most robust one? > >> Signed-off-by: Martin Brandenburg <martin@...ibond.com> >> --- >> fs/orangefs/dcache.c | 2 +- >> fs/orangefs/namei.c | 16 ++++++++-------- >> fs/orangefs/orangefs-utils.c | 2 +- >> fs/orangefs/super.c | 6 +++--- >> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/orangefs/dcache.c b/fs/orangefs/dcache.c >> index 5dfc4f3..0710869 100644 >> --- a/fs/orangefs/dcache.c >> +++ b/fs/orangefs/dcache.c >> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static int orangefs_revalidate_lookup(struct dentry *dentry) >> >> new_op->upcall.req.lookup.sym_follow = ORANGEFS_LOOKUP_LINK_NO_FOLLOW; >> new_op->upcall.req.lookup.parent_refn = parent->refn; >> - strncpy(new_op->upcall.req.lookup.d_name, >> + strlcpy(new_op->upcall.req.lookup.d_name, >> dentry->d_name.name, >> ORANGEFS_NAME_MAX); >> >> diff --git a/fs/orangefs/namei.c b/fs/orangefs/namei.c >> index 5a60c50..fc7e948 100644 >> --- a/fs/orangefs/namei.c >> +++ b/fs/orangefs/namei.c >> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int orangefs_create(struct inode *dir, >> fill_default_sys_attrs(new_op->upcall.req.create.attributes, >> ORANGEFS_TYPE_METAFILE, mode); >> >> - strncpy(new_op->upcall.req.create.d_name, >> + strlcpy(new_op->upcall.req.create.d_name, >> dentry->d_name.name, ORANGEFS_NAME_MAX); >> >> ret = service_operation(new_op, __func__, get_interruptible_flag(dir)); >> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static struct dentry *orangefs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, >> &parent->refn.khandle); >> new_op->upcall.req.lookup.parent_refn = parent->refn; >> >> - strncpy(new_op->upcall.req.lookup.d_name, dentry->d_name.name, >> + strlcpy(new_op->upcall.req.lookup.d_name, dentry->d_name.name, >> ORANGEFS_NAME_MAX); >> >> gossip_debug(GOSSIP_NAME_DEBUG, >> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static int orangefs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry) >> return -ENOMEM; >> >> new_op->upcall.req.remove.parent_refn = parent->refn; >> - strncpy(new_op->upcall.req.remove.d_name, dentry->d_name.name, >> + strlcpy(new_op->upcall.req.remove.d_name, dentry->d_name.name, >> ORANGEFS_NAME_MAX); >> >> ret = service_operation(new_op, "orangefs_unlink", >> @@ -282,10 +282,10 @@ static int orangefs_symlink(struct inode *dir, >> ORANGEFS_TYPE_SYMLINK, >> mode); >> >> - strncpy(new_op->upcall.req.sym.entry_name, >> + strlcpy(new_op->upcall.req.sym.entry_name, >> dentry->d_name.name, >> ORANGEFS_NAME_MAX); >> - strncpy(new_op->upcall.req.sym.target, symname, ORANGEFS_NAME_MAX); >> + strlcpy(new_op->upcall.req.sym.target, symname, ORANGEFS_NAME_MAX); >> >> ret = service_operation(new_op, __func__, get_interruptible_flag(dir)); >> >> @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int orangefs_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode >> fill_default_sys_attrs(new_op->upcall.req.mkdir.attributes, >> ORANGEFS_TYPE_DIRECTORY, mode); >> >> - strncpy(new_op->upcall.req.mkdir.d_name, >> + strlcpy(new_op->upcall.req.mkdir.d_name, >> dentry->d_name.name, ORANGEFS_NAME_MAX); >> >> ret = service_operation(new_op, __func__, get_interruptible_flag(dir)); >> @@ -419,10 +419,10 @@ static int orangefs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, >> new_op->upcall.req.rename.old_parent_refn = ORANGEFS_I(old_dir)->refn; >> new_op->upcall.req.rename.new_parent_refn = ORANGEFS_I(new_dir)->refn; >> >> - strncpy(new_op->upcall.req.rename.d_old_name, >> + strlcpy(new_op->upcall.req.rename.d_old_name, >> old_dentry->d_name.name, >> ORANGEFS_NAME_MAX); >> - strncpy(new_op->upcall.req.rename.d_new_name, >> + strlcpy(new_op->upcall.req.rename.d_new_name, >> new_dentry->d_name.name, >> ORANGEFS_NAME_MAX); >> >> diff --git a/fs/orangefs/orangefs-utils.c b/fs/orangefs/orangefs-utils.c >> index 40f5163..d72f3fc 100644 >> --- a/fs/orangefs/orangefs-utils.c >> +++ b/fs/orangefs/orangefs-utils.c >> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ int orangefs_unmount_sb(struct super_block *sb) >> return -ENOMEM; >> new_op->upcall.req.fs_umount.id = ORANGEFS_SB(sb)->id; >> new_op->upcall.req.fs_umount.fs_id = ORANGEFS_SB(sb)->fs_id; >> - strncpy(new_op->upcall.req.fs_umount.orangefs_config_server, >> + strlcpy(new_op->upcall.req.fs_umount.orangefs_config_server, >> ORANGEFS_SB(sb)->devname, >> ORANGEFS_MAX_SERVER_ADDR_LEN); >> >> diff --git a/fs/orangefs/super.c b/fs/orangefs/super.c >> index b9da9a0..5f9a4ff 100644 >> --- a/fs/orangefs/super.c >> +++ b/fs/orangefs/super.c >> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ int orangefs_remount(struct orangefs_sb_info_s *orangefs_sb) >> new_op = op_alloc(ORANGEFS_VFS_OP_FS_MOUNT); >> if (!new_op) >> return -ENOMEM; >> - strncpy(new_op->upcall.req.fs_mount.orangefs_config_server, >> + strlcpy(new_op->upcall.req.fs_mount.orangefs_config_server, >> orangefs_sb->devname, >> ORANGEFS_MAX_SERVER_ADDR_LEN); >> >> @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ struct dentry *orangefs_mount(struct file_system_type *fst, >> if (!new_op) >> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >> >> - strncpy(new_op->upcall.req.fs_mount.orangefs_config_server, >> + strlcpy(new_op->upcall.req.fs_mount.orangefs_config_server, >> devname, >> ORANGEFS_MAX_SERVER_ADDR_LEN); >> >> @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ struct dentry *orangefs_mount(struct file_system_type *fst, >> * on successful mount, store the devname and data >> * used >> */ >> - strncpy(ORANGEFS_SB(sb)->devname, >> + strlcpy(ORANGEFS_SB(sb)->devname, >> devname, >> ORANGEFS_MAX_SERVER_ADDR_LEN); >> >> -- >> 2.7.4 >> > > > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists