[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5706EF94.6010903@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:39:00 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] extcon: usb-gpio: Don't miss event during suspend/resume
On 2016년 04월 06일 23:01, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Pin state might have changed during suspend/resume while
> our interrupts were disabled. Scan for change during resume.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
> ---
> drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c
> index 2b2fecf..20175ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ static int usb_extcon_resume(struct device *dev)
> }
>
> enable_irq(info->id_irq);
> + usb_extcon_detect_cable(&info->wq_detcable.work);
If interrupt is using as wakeup source/irq,
after wake-up from suspend state, the interrupt handler will be handled.
But, if interrupt is not used for wakeup source/irq,
As your patch, we need to check the state on resume().
So, I think you need more condition to check the interrupt is whether wakeup source or not.
Thanks,
Chanwoo CHoi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists