[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160408061929.GG9674@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 11:49:29 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Call cpufreq_disable_fast_switch() in
sugov_exit()
On 07-04-16, 23:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Due to differences in the cpufreq core's handling of runtime CPU
> offline and nonboot CPUs disabling during system suspend-to-RAM,
> fast frequency switching gets disabled after a suspend-to-RAM and
> resume cycle on all of the nonboot CPUs.
>
> To prevent that from happening, move the invocation of
> cpufreq_disable_fast_switch() from cpufreq_exit_governor() to
> sugov_exit(), as the schedutil governor is the only user of fast
> frequency switching today anyway.
>
> That simply prevents cpufreq_disable_fast_switch() from being called
> without invoking the ->governor callback for the CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT
> event (which happens during system suspend now).
>
> Fixes: b7898fda5bc7 (cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching)
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists