linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] x86/cpu: Add Erratum 88 detection on AMD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Apr 2016 11:51:24 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rudolf Marek <r.marek@...embler.cz>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] x86/cpu: Add Erratum 88 detection on AMD

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 06:40:13PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Ingo, etc: we should probably apply one of those patches with a
> -stable tag (to mitigate the otherwise potentially unpleasant
> performance regression in here), but I don't really care which one.
> Andi's has a name for the bug that seems nicer by one character to me,
> but it would have to be (trivally) rebased.

I don't care which one as long as the commit message says "erratum 88"
somewhere.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.