[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57079331.9060105@synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:17:05 +0100
From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
"vinholikatti@...il.com" <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com" <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
CC: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"ygardi@...eaurora.org" <ygardi@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] scsi: ufs: connect to RPMB subsystem
Hi,
On 4/7/2016 10:15 PM, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 09:51 +0100, Joao Pinto wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 4/4/2016 12:11 PM, Tomas Winkler wrote:
>>> Register UFS RPMB LUN with the RPMB subsystem and provide
>>> implementation for the RPMB access operations. RPMB partition is
>>> accessed via a sequence of security protocol in and security
>>> protocol
>>> out commands with UFS specific parameters. This multi step process
>>> is
>>> abstracted into 4 basic RPMB commands.
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> * "UFS device" W-LU.
>>> */
>>> struct scsi_device *sdev_ufs_device;
>>> + struct scsi_device *sdev_ufs_rpmb;
>>>
>>> enum ufs_dev_pwr_mode curr_dev_pwr_mode;
>>> enum uic_link_state uic_link_state;
>>>
>>
>> I have a UFS device emulator that has the RPMB capability. What are
>> the expected
>> good results for me to validate?
>
> Hi Joao, thanks for that. I'm attaching an archive with few basic
> samples via user space interface.
> You should run the program key first (program-key.sh), just don't do it
> on a real device it's one in life time operation.
>
> Thanks
> Tomas
>
I have tested your patch set the following way:
Patches applied:
- Got 4.7-queue from the SCSI repo
- Applied the patch set for DW UFS support
- Applied your patch set for RPMB support
Platform (UFS IP Prototyping Kit):
- CPU: ARC CPU 32-bit
- UFS 2.0 Core running in FPGA
Results:
Kernel Build without RPMB configured: OK
Kernel Build with RPMB configured: OK
UFS Device partitions shown in UFS Host without RPMB configured: Yes
UFS Device partitions shown in UFS Host with RPMB configured: Yes
I would like to run more verifications regarding RPMB. Could you tell me what is
the procedure you suggest?
Thanks,
Joao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists