linux-kernel - [QUEUED v20160408 02/18] stm class: Fix integer boundary checks for master range

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1460127401-30801-3-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Fri,  8 Apr 2016 17:56:25 +0300
From:	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
	Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>,
	laurent.fert@...el.com, yann.fouassier@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [QUEUED v20160408 02/18] stm class: Fix integer boundary checks for master range

From: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>

Master IDs are of unsigned int type, yet in the configfs policy code
we're validating user's input against INT_MAX. This is both pointless
and misleading as the real limits are imposed by the stm device's
[sw_start..sw_end] (which are also limited by the spec to be no larger
than 2^16-1).

Clean this up by getting rid of the redundant comparisons.

Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c
index 1db189657b..e8b50b1ac6 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c
@@ -107,8 +107,7 @@ stp_policy_node_masters_store(struct config_item *item, const char *page,
 		goto unlock;
 
 	/* must be within [sw_start..sw_end], which is an inclusive range */
-	if (first > INT_MAX || last > INT_MAX || first > last ||
-	    first < stm->data->sw_start ||
+	if (first > last || first < stm->data->sw_start ||
 	    last > stm->data->sw_end) {
 		ret = -ERANGE;
 		goto unlock;
-- 
2.8.0.rc3