linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf trace: Print content of bpf-output event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5707D45F.1060801@huawei.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Apr 2016 23:55:11 +0800
From:	"Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To:	<acme@...nel.org>
CC:	<pi3orama@....com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<lizefan@...wei.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf trace: Print content of bpf-output event

Sorry. This patch should be squash into patch 1/4. The commit message
is wrong. The main part of described patch is already accepted and merged:

1d6c940 perf trace: Print content of bpf-output event

Thank you.

On 2016/4/8 23:07, Wang Nan wrote:
> With this patch the contend of BPF output event is printed by
> 'perf trace'. For example:
>
>   # ./perf trace -a --ev bpf-output/no-inherit,name=evt/ \
>                     --ev ./test_bpf_trace.c/map:channel.event=evt/ \
>                     usleep 100000
>    ...
>      1.787 ( 0.004 ms): usleep/3832 nanosleep(rqtp: 0x7ffc78b18980                                        ) ...
>      1.787 (         ): evt:Raise a BPF event!..)
>      1.788 (         ): perf_bpf_probe:func_begin:(ffffffff810e97d0))
>    ...
>    101.866 (87.038 ms): gmain/1654 poll(ufds: 0x7f57a80008c0, nfds: 2, timeout_msecs: 1000               ) ...
>    101.866 (         ): evt:Raise a BPF event!..)
>    101.867 (         ): perf_bpf_probe:func_end:(ffffffff810e97d0 <- ffffffff81796173))
>    101.869 (100.087 ms): usleep/3832  ... [continued]: nanosleep()) = 0
>    ...
>
>   (There is an extra ')' at the end of several lines. However, it is
>    another problem, unrelated to this commit.)
>
> Where test_bpf_trace.c is:
>   /************************ BEGIN **************************/
>   #include <uapi/linux/bpf.h>
>   struct bpf_map_def {
>          unsigned int type;
>          unsigned int key_size;
>          unsigned int value_size;
>          unsigned int max_entries;
>   };
>   #define SEC(NAME) __attribute__((section(NAME), used))
>   static u64 (*ktime_get_ns)(void) =
>          (void *)BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns;
>   static int (*trace_printk)(const char *fmt, int fmt_size, ...) =
>          (void *)BPF_FUNC_trace_printk;
>   static int (*get_smp_processor_id)(void) =
>          (void *)BPF_FUNC_get_smp_processor_id;
>   static int (*perf_event_output)(void *, struct bpf_map_def *, int, void *, unsigned long) =
>          (void *)BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output;
>
>   struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") channel = {
>          .type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY,
>          .key_size = sizeof(int),
>          .value_size = sizeof(u32),
>          .max_entries = __NR_CPUS__,
>   };
>
>   static inline int __attribute__((always_inline))
>   func(void *ctx, int type)
>   {
> 	char output_str[] = "Raise a BPF event!";
> 	char err_str[] = "BAD %d\n";
> 	int err;
>
>          err = perf_event_output(ctx, &channel, get_smp_processor_id(),
> 			        &output_str, sizeof(output_str));
> 	if (err)
> 		trace_printk(err_str, sizeof(err_str), err);
>          return 1;
>   }
>   SEC("func_begin=sys_nanosleep")
>   int func_begin(void *ctx) {return func(ctx, 1);}
>   SEC("func_end=sys_nanosleep%return")
>   int func_end(void *ctx) { return func(ctx, 2);}
>   char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
>   int _version SEC("version") = LINUX_VERSION_CODE;
>   /************************* END ***************************/
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
> Cc: pi3orama@....com
> ---
>   tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 13 +++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> index 6fbed86..fb8257f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> @@ -2680,11 +2680,15 @@ out_enomem:
>   	goto out;
>   }
>   
> -static int validate_evlist(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
> +static int validate_evlist(struct perf_evlist *evlist, bool *has_bpf_output)
>   {
>   	struct perf_evsel *evsel;
>   
>   	evlist__for_each(evlist, evsel) {
> +		if (perf_evsel__is_bpf_output(evsel)) {
> +			*has_bpf_output = true;
> +			continue;
> +		}
>   		if (evsel->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)
>   			return -EINVAL;
>   	}
> @@ -3268,6 +3272,7 @@ int cmd_trace(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>   	const char * const trace_subcommands[] = { "record", NULL };
>   	int err;
>   	char bf[BUFSIZ];
> +	bool has_bpf_output = false;
>   
>   	signal(SIGSEGV, sighandler_dump_stack);
>   	signal(SIGFPE, sighandler_dump_stack);
> @@ -3284,12 +3289,12 @@ int cmd_trace(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>   	argc = parse_options_subcommand(argc, argv, trace_options, trace_subcommands,
>   				 trace_usage, PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
>   
> -	if (validate_evlist(trace.evlist)) {
> -		pr_err("Only support tracepoint events!\n");
> +	if (validate_evlist(trace.evlist, &has_bpf_output)) {
> +		pr_err("Only support tracepoint and bpf-output events!\n");
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (trace.trace_pgfaults) {
> +	if (trace.trace_pgfaults || has_bpf_output) {
>   		trace.opts.sample_address = true;
>   		trace.opts.sample_time = true;
>   	}