linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] regulator: twl: Provide of_map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160408175456.GY16484@atomide.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:54:56 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...g0.de>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
	broonie@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] regulator: twl: Provide of_map_mode for twl4030

* Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> [160408 09:21]:
> * Sebastian Reichel <sre@...g0.de> [160408 09:09]:
> > Hi Tony,
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 08:49:07AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> [160407 10:58]:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:59:34AM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> > > > > of_map_mode is needed so to be possible to set initial regulators mode from
> > > > > the board DTS. Otherwise, for DT boot, regulators are left in their default
> > > > > state after reset/reboot. Document device specific modes as well.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  .../bindings/regulator/twl-regulator.txt           |  6 ++++++
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > 
> > > I'd like to test these patches, but I don't know which combination
> > > of patches needed? It seems we're waiting for an update on at least
> > > one of the patches in this series?
> > > 
> > > Might be best to repost the whole series so people can test the
> > > right patches.
> > 
> > As far as I can see Mark has already queued all patches in his
> > for-next branch and they are already in today's linux-next, so
> > you can just test linux-next.
> 
> OK thanks will do.

Yup PM seems to work just fine with these.

Tony