linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: nuc900: allow compiling with COMPILE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACna6rwd4oka12UFJJY8Tv-d2dLr_AQxKzsJAb8LNePxD1Wrpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 9 Apr 2016 10:42:00 +0200
From:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To:	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>,
	adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc:	kbuild-all@...org,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: nuc900: allow compiling with COMPILE_TEST

On 9 April 2016 at 01:40, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> [auto build test WARNING on mtd/master]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.6-rc2 next-20160408]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system]
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Rafa-Mi-ecki/mtd-nand-nuc900-allow-compiling-with-COMPILE_TEST/20160408-185814
> base:   git://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd.git master
> config: blackfin-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
> reproduce:
>         wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make.cross ARCH=blackfin
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>>> drivers/mtd/nand/nuc900_nand.c:36:0: warning: "SWRST" redefined [enabled by default]
>    arch/blackfin/mach-bf533/include/mach/defBF532.h:25:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition

Uh, I'm not sure what to do about this. The name SWRST sounds a bit
generic so I guess it shouldn't be defined by any common header.

In case of blackfin it's part of the System Interrupt Controller and
other defines are prefixed with SIC_. Maybe we should rename
blackfin's SWRST to SIC_SWRST?