[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160409123825.3550eb16@arm.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:38:25 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] irqchip/gic: Remove static irq_chip definition
for eoimode1
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:19:14 +0000
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com> wrote:
> There are only 3 differences (not including the name) in the definitions
> of the gic_chip and gic_eoimode1_chip structures. Instead of statically
> defining the gic_eoimode1_chip structure, remove it and populate the
> eoimode1 functions dynamically for the appropriate GIC irqchips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Linus' remark notwithstanding,
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists