[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j-5Eva2QReG4LHvyZR-iL5rrrWp-3erdfz-u+5xbwRKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 14:31:22 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [regression] cross core scheduling frequency drop bisected to 0c313cb20732
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 10:59:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Friday, April 08, 2016 08:50:54 AM Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 08:45 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> >
>> > > Cute, I thought you used governor=performance for your runs?
>> >
>> > I do, and those numbers are with it thus set.
>>
>> Well, this is a trade-off.
>>
>> 4.5 introduced a power regression here so this one goes back to the previous
>> state of things.
>
> Just for my elucidation; how can gov=performance have a 'power'
> regression?
Because of what is used as the "default" idle state most of the time.
C1 was used before 4.5 and that changed to polling in 4.5.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists