linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.5 157/238] ARC: bitops: Remove non relevant comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160410183505.129565077@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 10 Apr 2016 11:35:34 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.5 157/238] ARC: bitops: Remove non relevant comments

4.5-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>

commit 2a41b6dc28dc71c1a3f1622612a26edc58f7561e upstream.

commit 80f420842ff42 removed the ARC bitops microoptimization but failed
to prune the comments to same effect

Fixes: 80f420842ff42 ("ARC: Make ARC bitops "safer" (add anti-optimization)")
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arc/include/asm/bitops.h |   15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arc/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -35,21 +35,6 @@ static inline void op##_bit(unsigned lon
 									\
 	m += nr >> 5;							\
 									\
-	/*								\
-	 * ARC ISA micro-optimization:					\
-	 *								\
-	 * Instructions dealing with bitpos only consider lower 5 bits	\
-	 * e.g (x << 33) is handled like (x << 1) by ASL instruction	\
-	 *  (mem pointer still needs adjustment to point to next word)	\
-	 *								\
-	 * Hence the masking to clamp @nr arg can be elided in general.	\
-	 *								\
-	 * However if @nr is a constant (above assumed in a register),	\
-	 * and greater than 31, gcc can optimize away (x << 33) to 0,	\
-	 * as overflow, given the 32-bit ISA. Thus masking needs to be	\
-	 * done for const @nr, but no code is generated due to gcc	\
-	 * const prop.							\
-	 */								\
 	nr &= 0x1f;							\
 									\
 	__asm__ __volatile__(						\