linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 210/210] perf/x86/intel: Fix PEBS data source interpretation on Nehalem/Westmere

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 10 Apr 2016 11:37:11 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, jolsa@...nel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 210/210] perf/x86/intel: Fix PEBS data source interpretation on Nehalem/Westmere

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

commit 5e3f4cbd906c178510dccfed1131b007c96255ff upstream.

Jiri reported some time ago that some entries in the PEBS data source table
in perf do not agree with the SDM. We investigated and the bits
changed for Sandy Bridge, but the SDM was not updated.

perf already implements the bits correctly for Sandy Bridge
and later. This patch patches it up for Nehalem and Westmere.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: jolsa@...nel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456871124-15985-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h          |    2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c    |    2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c |   11 ++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -908,6 +908,8 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_init_hsw(void);
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_init_skl(void);
 
+void intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_nhm(void);
+
 int intel_pmu_setup_lbr_filter(struct perf_event *event);
 
 void intel_pt_interrupt(void);
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -3336,6 +3336,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND] =
 			X86_CONFIG(.event=0xb1, .umask=0x3f, .inv=1, .cmask=1);
 
+		intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_nhm();
 		x86_add_quirk(intel_nehalem_quirk);
 
 		pr_cont("Nehalem events, ");
@@ -3398,6 +3399,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND] =
 			X86_CONFIG(.event=0xb1, .umask=0x3f, .inv=1, .cmask=1);
 
+		intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_nhm();
 		pr_cont("Westmere events, ");
 		break;
 
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ union intel_x86_pebs_dse {
 #define OP_LH (P(OP, LOAD) | P(LVL, HIT))
 #define SNOOP_NONE_MISS (P(SNOOP, NONE) | P(SNOOP, MISS))
 
-static const u64 pebs_data_source[] = {
+/* Version for Sandy Bridge and later */
+static u64 pebs_data_source[] = {
 	P(OP, LOAD) | P(LVL, MISS) | P(LVL, L3) | P(SNOOP, NA),/* 0x00:ukn L3 */
 	OP_LH | P(LVL, L1)  | P(SNOOP, NONE),	/* 0x01: L1 local */
 	OP_LH | P(LVL, LFB) | P(SNOOP, NONE),	/* 0x02: LFB hit */
@@ -70,6 +71,14 @@ static const u64 pebs_data_source[] = {
 	OP_LH | P(LVL, UNC) | P(SNOOP, NONE), /* 0x0f: uncached */
 };
 
+/* Patch up minor differences in the bits */
+void __init intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_nhm(void)
+{
+	pebs_data_source[0x05] = OP_LH | P(LVL, L3)  | P(SNOOP, HIT);
+	pebs_data_source[0x06] = OP_LH | P(LVL, L3)  | P(SNOOP, HITM);
+	pebs_data_source[0x07] = OP_LH | P(LVL, L3)  | P(SNOOP, HITM);
+}
+
 static u64 precise_store_data(u64 status)
 {
 	union intel_x86_pebs_dse dse;