linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 2/6] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: clear BAM interrupt only if it is raised

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1460363923-16296-3-git-send-email-stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org>
Date:	Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:38:39 +0300
From:	Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
To:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
	Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
	Pramod Gurav <gpramod@...eaurora.org>,
	Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/6] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: clear BAM interrupt only if it is raised

Currently we write BAM_IRQ_CLR register with zero even when no
BAM_IRQ occured. This write has some bad side effects when the
BAM instance is for the crypto engine. In case of crypto engine
some of the BAM registers are xPU protected and they cannot be
controlled by the driver.

Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Pramod Gurav <gpramod@...eaurora.org>
---
 drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c |   12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
index a486bc0f82e0..789d5f836bf7 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
@@ -801,13 +801,17 @@ static irqreturn_t bam_dma_irq(int irq, void *data)
 	if (srcs & P_IRQ)
 		tasklet_schedule(&bdev->task);
 
-	if (srcs & BAM_IRQ)
+	if (srcs & BAM_IRQ) {
 		clr_mask = readl_relaxed(bam_addr(bdev, 0, BAM_IRQ_STTS));
 
-	/* don't allow reorder of the various accesses to the BAM registers */
-	mb();
+		/*
+		 * don't allow reorder of the various accesses to the BAM
+		 * registers
+		 */
+		mb();
 
-	writel_relaxed(clr_mask, bam_addr(bdev, 0, BAM_IRQ_CLR));
+		writel_relaxed(clr_mask, bam_addr(bdev, 0, BAM_IRQ_CLR));
+	}
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5