[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160411085323.GM4592@x1>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:53:23 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Flora Fu <flora.fu@...iatek.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mfd: mt6397: Checking for null before
irq_domain_remove.
FAO Thomas,
On Fri, 08 Apr 2016, Henry Chen wrote:
> It is possible that pmic->irq_domain will be NULL in fail_irq error handling.
> Check before calling irq_domain_remove.
>
> Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> index a879223..15050cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,8 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> fail_irq:
> if (ret) {
> - irq_domain_remove(pmic->irq_domain);
> + if (pmic->irq_domain)
> + irq_domain_remove(pmic->irq_domain);
You might be better off making this change in the framework.
Just get irq_domain_remove() to harmlessly return if !irq_domain.
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to add child devices: %d\n", ret);
> }
>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists