[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160411104128.GB14134@e106622-lin>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:41:28 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bsegall@...gle.com, pjt@...gle.com,
morten.rasmussen@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Optimize sum computation with a lookup
table
Hi,
On 11/04/16 06:36, Yuyang Du wrote:
> __compute_runnable_contrib() uses a loop to compute sum, whereas a
> table loopup can do it faster in a constant time.
>
> The following python script can be used to generate the constants:
>
> print " #: yN_inv yN_sum"
> print "-----------------------"
> y = (0.5)**(1/32.0)
> x = 2**32
> xx = 1024
> for i in range(0, 32):
> if i == 0:
> x = x-1
> xx = xx*y
> else:
> x = x*y
> xx = int(xx*y + 1024*y)
> print "%2d: %#x %8d" % (i, int(x), int(xx))
>
> print " #: sum_N32"
> print "------------"
> xxx = xx
> for i in range(0, 11):
> if i == 0:
> xxx = xx
> else:
> xxx = xxx/2 + xx
> print "%2d: %8d" % (i, xxx)
>
Thanks for the script, really useful. Do you think there is value in
making it general? Like if we want to play with/need changing LOAD_AVG_
PERIOD in the future to something different than 32.
Also, does the following assume LOAD_AVG_PERIOD == 32? And if yes, do
you think there is any value in removing that assumption?
Best,
- Juri
> Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index b8cc1c3..6e0eec0 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -2603,6 +2603,15 @@ static const u32 runnable_avg_yN_sum[] = {
> };
>
> /*
> + * Precomputed \Sum y^k { 1<=k<=n, where n%32=0). Values are rolled down to
> + * lower integers.
> + */
> +static const u32 __accumulated_sum_N32[] = {
> + 0, 23371, 35056, 40899, 43820, 45281,
> + 46011, 46376, 46559, 46650, 46696, 46719,
> +};
> +
> +/*
> * Approximate:
> * val * y^n, where y^32 ~= 0.5 (~1 scheduling period)
> */
> @@ -2650,14 +2659,9 @@ static u32 __compute_runnable_contrib(u64 n)
> else if (unlikely(n >= LOAD_AVG_MAX_N))
> return LOAD_AVG_MAX;
>
> - /* Compute \Sum k^n combining precomputed values for k^i, \Sum k^j */
> - do {
> - contrib /= 2; /* y^LOAD_AVG_PERIOD = 1/2 */
> - contrib += runnable_avg_yN_sum[LOAD_AVG_PERIOD];
> -
> - n -= LOAD_AVG_PERIOD;
> - } while (n > LOAD_AVG_PERIOD);
> -
> + /* Since n < LOAD_AVG_MAX_N, n/LOAD_AVG_PERIOD < 11 */
> + contrib = __accumulated_sum_N32[n>>5]; /* =n/LOAD_AVG_PERIOD */
> + n %= LOAD_AVG_PERIOD;
> contrib = decay_load(contrib, n);
> return contrib + runnable_avg_yN_sum[n];
> }
> --
> 2.1.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists