linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] da8xx USB clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <570B8A5C.1050907@ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:58:28 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
CC:	<petr@...ix.com>, <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	<David.Laight@...LAB.COM>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] da8xx USB clocks

Hi David,

On Thursday 07 April 2016 09:59 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> Any further comments before I submit a v4 patchset? Particularly on
> patches 3 and 4 which are new in this v3 submission and have not been
> commented on yet.

I applied some patches which could be applied independently without
driver dependency. I have pushed those to my for-testing[1] branch where
they will get tested a little more before I send my pull request to ARM-SoC.

For your future submissions, you can drop the patches already applied to
the branch above.

Also, I think it will help if you divide the series into driver and
platform changes. You should keep all maintainers copied in both places.
But dividing the series this way should help concentrate review. This is
a complex series with multiple maintainers involved so it will take some
co-ordination. Hopefully it can still all go into the upcoming merge window.

Regards,
Sekhar

[1]
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/nsekhar/linux-davinci.git/log/?h=for-testing