[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160411124739.GB3976@osiris>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:47:39 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/19] s390: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:28:37PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 13:08:06 +0200
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> >
> > __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
> > around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.
> >
> > arch_dup_task_struct uses __GFP_REPEAT for fpu_regs_size which is either
> > sizeof(__vector128) * __NUM_VXRS = 4069B resp.
> > sizeof(freg_t) * __NUM_FPRS = 1024B AFAICS. page_table_alloc then uses
> > the flag for a single page allocation. This means that this flag has
> > never been actually useful here because it has always been used only for
> > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY requests.
> >
> > Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
>
> Let's cc: Martin/Heiko instead :)
>
> > Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/kernel/process.c | 2 +-
> > arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists