[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jV_b7BxPBGRPVPNx47FR+sqYv=ZFCNuZO+MBUK-u2yqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:31:10 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Cc: "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / tables: Move table override mechanisms to tables.c
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Zheng, Lv <lv.zheng@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi, Rafael
Hi,
>> From: Zheng, Lv
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / tables: Move table override mechanisms to
>> tables.c
>>
>> This patch moves acpi_os_table_override() and
>> acpi_os_physical_table_override() to tables.c.
>>
[cut]
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_INITRD_TABLE_OVERRIDE
>> -void acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size);
>> +void early_acpi_table_init(void *data, size_t size);
>> #else
>> -static inline void acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size)
>> +static inline void early_acpi_table_init(void *data, size_t size)
>> {
>> }
>> #endif
> [Lv Zheng]
> This block was wrong.
> early_acpi_table_init() is no longer dependent on CONFIG_ACPI_INITRD_TABLE_OVERRIDE but dependent on CONFIG_ACPI.
I see.
> Updated v2 patches are sent to the mailing list.
Is this the only difference between v1 and v2?
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists