[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <705b8bf90fa2db1bf4bf93a47e4ecf12ed31dbb4.1460380917.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:22:29 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>,
eranian@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 27/98] perf, nmi: Fix unknown NMI warning
From: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
commit a3ef2229c94ff70998724cb64b9cb4c77db9e950 upstream.
When using BTS on Core i7-4*, I get the below kernel warning.
$ perf record -c 1 -e branches:u ls
Message from syslogd@...pc1501 at Nov 11 15:49:25 ...
kernel:[ 438.317893] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 31 on CPU 2.
Message from syslogd@...pc1501 at Nov 11 15:49:25 ...
kernel:[ 438.317920] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
Message from syslogd@...pc1501 at Nov 11 15:49:25 ...
kernel:[ 438.317945] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
Make intel_pmu_handle_irq() take the full exit path when returning early.
Cc: eranian@...gle.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1392425048-5309-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index b400d0be5b03..d2080aa4322a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1341,10 +1341,8 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
intel_pmu_disable_all();
handled = intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer();
status = intel_pmu_get_status();
- if (!status) {
- intel_pmu_enable_all(0);
- return handled;
- }
+ if (!status)
+ goto done;
loops = 0;
again:
--
2.8.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists