[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1604111043340.2314-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:44:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: chunfeng yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: core: buffer: avoid NULL pointer dereferrence
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, chunfeng yun wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 08:07 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > chunfeng yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com> writes:
> > > On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 07:07 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 05:08:03PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > >> > NULL pointer dereferrence will happen when class driver
> > >> > wants to allocate zero length buffer and pool_max[0]
> > >> > can't be used, so skip reserved pool in this case.
> > >>
> > >> Why would a driver want to allocate a 0 length buffer? What driver does
> > >> this?
> > > It's misc/usbtest.c
> >
> > that'll do what you ask it to do with the userspace tool testusb. Are
> > you trying to pass a size of 0 ?
> >
> No, I just ran "testusb -t10" which called test_ctrl_queue().
> In this function, sub-case 8 passed a parameter @len as 0 to
> simple_alloc_urb(), and then it tried to allocate a 0-length buffer.
That should be easy enough to fix. Just skip the calls that allocate
the buffer if the length would be 0.
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists