[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160411151714.GB25938@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:17:15 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dm: ioctl: use kvfree
On Mon, Apr 11 2016 at 11:14am -0400,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
> We can use kvfree() instead of calling kfree() and vfree() based on
> if-else and param_flags. kvfree() will check the type of address and
> will call the respective function to free it.
> Additionally we can also remove the use of DM_PARAMS_KMALLOC and
> DM_PARAMS_VMALLOC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
Have you actually tested htis? Last time I looked to do this it exposed
crashes. I don't have time to dig into this again right now but this is
_not_ as simple as this patch implies.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists