linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160411165725.GA3343@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:57:25 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 01:49:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/brw_test.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lu_object.h
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_internal.h
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_mmap.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/rw.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/rw26.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/vvp_io.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/vvp_page.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/class_obd.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdecho/echo_client.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_cache.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_request.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   09cbfeaf1a5a ("mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros")
>   ea1754a08476 ("mm, fs: remove remaining PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} usage")
> 
> from Linus' tree and lots of commits from the staging tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below the signature) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> I also added this merge fix patch:

Thanks for this, it should all now be resolved in my tree.

greg k-h