linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <570BF1DB.1040700@youngman.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:50:03 +0100
From:	Wols Lists <antlists@...ngman.org.uk>
To:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM

On 11/04/16 17:39, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Monday 11 April 2016 09:53 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:45:01PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>> L stands for "Mailing list that is relevant to this area", and this is a
>>> mailing list. :)
>>
>> Your proposed patch isn't changing the L entry, so this is of no
>> relevance.
> 
> Sorry, I am not understanding.
> 
> The current entry in MAINTAINERS is:
> DEVICE-MAPPER  (LVM)
> M:      Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
> M:      Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
> M:      dm-devel@...hat.com
> L:      dm-devel@...hat.com
> ...
> 
> So my patch just removed the line : "M:      dm-devel@...hat.com"
> 
> So now the entry becomes :
> DEVICE-MAPPER  (LVM)
> M:      Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
> M:      Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
> L:      dm-devel@...hat.com
> ...
> 
> So, now it correctly shows dm-devel@...hat.com as a mailing list which
> should have cc to all the patches related to LVM.
> 
> Or am I understanding this wrong?

Yes. Because (I guess M stands for maintainer) this list has maintainer
status. As all patches should be sent to the maintainers therefore all
patches should be sent to this list.

The same person can appear twice in a phone book, once under their name
and once under their job title. This is exactly the same situation -
this list should appear once as a list to tell people that it's a list,
AND ALSO as a maintainer to tell people that patches must be sent to the
list.

I guess English is not your first language, but the important point is
that M and L are not mutually exclusive.

Cheers,
Wol