[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160411202112.GE5995@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 13:21:12 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@...com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
bcousson@...libre.com, linux@....linux.org.uk, paul@...an.com,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, vigneshr@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] ARM: dts: DRA7: Add dt nodes for PWMSS
* Franklin S Cooper Jr. <fcooper@...com> [160317 08:55]:
>
>
> On 03/17/2016 10:11 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:23:44PM -0600, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
> >> From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
> >>
> >> Add PWMSS device tree nodes for DRA7 SoC family and add documentation
> >> for dt bindings.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
> >> [fcooper@...com: Add eCAP and use updated bindings for PWMSS and ePWM]
> >> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>
> >> ---
> >> Version 5 changes:
> >> Add DT node for eCAP and update eCAP binding documentation
> >>
> >> Version 4 changes:
> >> Updated link to the latest documentation
> >>
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt | 9 +++
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.txt | 9 +++
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.txt | 15 +++-
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >> + ehrpwm1: pwm@...40200 {
> >> + compatible = "ti,dra7xx-ehrpwm",
> >> + "ti,am33xx-ehrpwm";
> >> + #pwm-cells = <3>;
> >> + reg = <0x48440200 0x80>;
> >> + clocks = <&ehrpwm1_tbclk>;
> >> + clock-names = "tbclk";
> >> + status = "disabled";
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + ecap1: ecap@...40100 {
> > This also is a PWM? Then it should also be pwm@...
>
> The enhanced capture module primary purpose is to measure
> time between external signals which is called capture mode.
> It also has a PWM mode. So I wouldn't recommend generalizing
> the entire node to pwm.
So is this patch safe for me to apply now or do we need more
changes?
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists