[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5F7315E704FA0841B5DFCE90329B2BB42CAC7024@BGSMSX102.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 04:04:55 +0000
From: "Chakravarty, Souvik K" <souvik.k.chakravarty@...el.com>
To: "Zha, Qipeng" <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] platform:x86 decouple telemetry driver from the
optional IPC resources
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zha, Qipeng
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 7:34 AM
> To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>; Aubrey Li
> <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>; Chakravarty, Souvik K
> <souvik.k.chakravarty@...el.com>
> Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] platform:x86 decouple telemetry driver from the
> optional IPC resources
>
> >> Currently the optional IPC resources prevent telemetry driver from
> >> probing if these resources are not in ACPI table. This patch
> >> decouples telemetry driver from these optional resources, so that
> >> telemetry driver has dependency only on the necessary ACPI resources.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
>
> >Given the impact to their recent contributions, I'm looking for reviews from
> Qipeng and Souvik before I merge this.
>
> >Qipeng, as the listed maintainer for these two files, I particularly need to
> hear from you.
>
> >Thanks,
>
> Hi Darren, I think this is a reasonable solution for such issue.
> Thanks Aubrey for this fixing patch.
We went over this internally once. So OK from my POV.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists