[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160411221700.GP24661@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:17:00 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>,
Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] percpu_stats: Enable 64-bit counts in 32-bit
architectures
Hello, Waiman.
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 02:45:38PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> The percpu_stats construct allows minimal overhead in maintaining statistics
> counts. The percpu_counter construct, on the other hand, has a higher
> performance overhead and a bit more complex to set up and tear down when
If you're referring to the preemption on/off, as I wrote before, we'll
probably be able to improve that with this_cpu_add_return so that the
only extra overhead is an easily predictable branch which is extremely
cheap. It's better to improve common constructs anyway.
> more than one statistics counts are needed. In fact, my first draft of the
And yeah, it can be cumbersome to set up and tear down multiple
percpu_counters. If there are enough consumers, we can extend
percpu_counter to handle multiple counters, right?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists