[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160412061007.GY3351@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:10:07 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: P L Sai Krishna <lakshmi.sai.krishna.potthuri@...inx.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Jagan Teki <jteki@...nedev.com>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Harini Katakam <harinik@...inx.com>,
Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaia@...inx.com>,
Anirudha Sarangi <anirudh@...inx.com>,
P L Sai Krishna <lakshmis@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v2 1/3] spi: Added dummy_cycle entry in the
spi_transfer structure.
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:09:27PM +0530, P L Sai Krishna wrote:
> + * @dummy_cycles: number of dummy cycles. If host controller requires
> + * dummy cycles rather than dummy bytes which send along with Cmd
> + * and address then this dummy_cycles is used.
I'm having a very hard time parsing this, partly because it is entirely
flash specific (the whole concept of cmd and address is missing from
SPI). As Cyrille said perhaps this should go in a flash specific
interface?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists