linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/7] ARM: dts: Add NoC Probe dt node for Exynos542x SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <570CAE67.4020001@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:14:31 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com, kgene@...nel.org,
	s.nawrocki@...sung.com, tomasz.figa@...il.com
Cc:	rjw@...ysocki.net, robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
	mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
	galak@...eaurora.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	linux.amoon@...il.com, m.reichl@...etechno.de,
	tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de, inki.dae@...sung.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] ARM: dts: Add NoC Probe dt node for Exynos542x SoC

On 04/08/2016 07:00 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch adds the NoCP (Network on Chip Probe) Device Tree node
> to measure the bandwidth of memory and g3d in Exynos542x SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
> index 7b99cb58d82d..d80f3b66f017 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
> @@ -294,6 +294,42 @@
>  		};
>  	};
>  
> +	nocp_mem0_0: nocp_mem0_0@...A1000 {

The node name should describe general class of device, so:

	nocp_mem0_0: nocp@...A1000 {
		...
	}
?

> +		compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-nocp";
> +		reg = <0x10CA1000 0x200>;
> +		status = "disabled";
> +	};
> +
> +	nocp_mem0_1: nocp_mem0_1@...A1400 {
> +		compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-nocp";
> +		reg = <0x10CA1400 0x200>;
> +		status = "disabled";
> +	};
> +
> +	nocp_mem0_2: nocp_mem0_2@...A1800 {

Shouldn't it be nocp_mem1_0?

> +		compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-nocp";
> +		reg = <0x10CA1800 0x200>;
> +		status = "disabled";
> +	};
> +
> +	nocp_mem0_3: nocp_mem0_3@...A1C00 {

Shouldn't it be nocp_mem1_1?


Best regards,
Krzysztof