lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1460455945-29644-18-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:12:18 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: [PATCH 17/24] mm, page_alloc: Reduce cost of fair zone allocation policy retry

The fair zone allocation policy is not without cost but it can be reduced
slightly. This patch removes an unnecessary local variable, checks the
likely conditions of the fair zone policy first, uses a bool instead of
a flags check and falls through when a remote node is encountered instead
of doing a full restart. The benefit is marginal but it's there

                                           4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                       decstat-v1r20              optfair-v1r20
Min      alloc-odr0-1               377.00 (  0.00%)           380.00 ( -0.80%)
Min      alloc-odr0-2               273.00 (  0.00%)           273.00 (  0.00%)
Min      alloc-odr0-4               226.00 (  0.00%)           227.00 ( -0.44%)
Min      alloc-odr0-8               196.00 (  0.00%)           196.00 (  0.00%)
Min      alloc-odr0-16              183.00 (  0.00%)           183.00 (  0.00%)
Min      alloc-odr0-32              175.00 (  0.00%)           173.00 (  1.14%)
Min      alloc-odr0-64              172.00 (  0.00%)           169.00 (  1.74%)
Min      alloc-odr0-128             170.00 (  0.00%)           169.00 (  0.59%)
Min      alloc-odr0-256             183.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  1.64%)
Min      alloc-odr0-512             191.00 (  0.00%)           190.00 (  0.52%)
Min      alloc-odr0-1024            199.00 (  0.00%)           198.00 (  0.50%)
Min      alloc-odr0-2048            204.00 (  0.00%)           204.00 (  0.00%)
Min      alloc-odr0-4096            210.00 (  0.00%)           209.00 (  0.48%)
Min      alloc-odr0-8192            213.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  0.00%)
Min      alloc-odr0-16384           214.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  0.00%)

The benefit is marginal at best but one of the most important benefits,
avoiding a second search when falling back to another node is not triggered
by this particular test so the benefit for some corner cases is understated.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 219e0d05ed88..25a8ab07b287 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2675,12 +2675,10 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
 {
 	struct zoneref *z;
 	struct zone *zone;
-	bool fair_skipped;
-	bool zonelist_rescan;
+	bool fair_skipped = false;
+	bool apply_fair = (alloc_flags & ALLOC_FAIR);
 
 zonelist_scan:
-	zonelist_rescan = false;
-
 	/*
 	 * Scan zonelist, looking for a zone with enough free.
 	 * See also __cpuset_node_allowed() comment in kernel/cpuset.c.
@@ -2700,13 +2698,16 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
 		 * page was allocated in should have no effect on the
 		 * time the page has in memory before being reclaimed.
 		 */
-		if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_FAIR) {
-			if (!zone_local(ac->preferred_zone, zone))
-				break;
+		if (apply_fair) {
 			if (test_bit(ZONE_FAIR_DEPLETED, &zone->flags)) {
 				fair_skipped = true;
 				continue;
 			}
+			if (!zone_local(ac->preferred_zone, zone)) {
+				if (fair_skipped)
+					goto reset_fair;
+				apply_fair = false;
+			}
 		}
 		/*
 		 * When allocating a page cache page for writing, we
@@ -2795,18 +2796,13 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
 	 * include remote zones now, before entering the slowpath and waking
 	 * kswapd: prefer spilling to a remote zone over swapping locally.
 	 */
-	if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_FAIR) {
-		alloc_flags &= ~ALLOC_FAIR;
-		if (fair_skipped) {
-			zonelist_rescan = true;
-			reset_alloc_batches(ac->preferred_zone);
-		}
-		if (nr_online_nodes > 1)
-			zonelist_rescan = true;
-	}
-
-	if (zonelist_rescan)
+	if (fair_skipped) {
+reset_fair:
+		apply_fair = false;
+		fair_skipped = false;
+		reset_alloc_batches(ac->preferred_zone);
 		goto zonelist_scan;
+	}
 
 	return NULL;
 }
-- 
2.6.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ