linux-kernel - [PATCH 10/28] mm, vmscan: By default have direct reclaim only shrink once per node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1460456783-30996-11-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:26:05 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: [PATCH 10/28] mm, vmscan: By default have direct reclaim only shrink once per node

Direct reclaim iterates over all zones in the zonelist and shrinking them
but this is in conflict with node-based reclaim. In the default case,
only shrink once per node.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index ef1cfa835138..f0bb2412fc01 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2545,14 +2545,6 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order)
  * try to reclaim pages from zones which will satisfy the caller's allocation
  * request.
  *
- * We reclaim from a zone even if that zone is over high_wmark_pages(zone).
- * Because:
- * a) The caller may be trying to free *extra* pages to satisfy a higher-order
- *    allocation or
- * b) The target zone may be at high_wmark_pages(zone) but the lower zones
- *    must go *over* high_wmark_pages(zone) to satisfy the `incremental min'
- *    zone defense algorithm.
- *
  * If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
  * scan then give up on it.
  *
@@ -2567,6 +2559,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc,
 	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
 	gfp_t orig_mask;
 	bool reclaimable = false;
+	pg_data_t *last_pgdat = NULL;
 
 	/*
 	 * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
@@ -2579,11 +2572,17 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc,
 
 	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
 					classzone_idx, sc->nodemask) {
-		if (!populated_zone(zone)) {
-			sc->reclaim_idx--;
-			classzone_idx--;
+		BUG_ON(!populated_zone(zone));
+
+		/*
+		 * Shrink each node in the zonelist once. If the zonelist is
+		 * ordered by zone (not the default) then a node may be
+		 * shrunk multiple times but in that case the user prefers
+		 * lower zones being preserved
+		 */
+		if (zone->zone_pgdat == last_pgdat)
 			continue;
-		}
+		last_pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
 
 		/*
 		 * Take care memory controller reclaiming has small influence
-- 
2.6.4