lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:31:00 +0200
From:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: reorder initialization steps in regulator_register()

device_register() is calling ->get_voltage() as part of is sysfs attribute
initialization process, and this functions might need to know the regulator
constraints to return a valid value.
This is at least true for the pwm regulator driver (when operating in
continuous mode) which needs to know the minimum and maximum voltage values
to calculate the current voltage:

min_uV + (((max_uV - min_uV) * dutycycle) / 100);

Move device_register() after set_machine_constraints() to make sure those
constraints are correctly initialized when ->get_voltage() is called.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index e0b7642..8258568 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -3950,13 +3950,6 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
 	rdev->dev.parent = dev;
 	dev_set_name(&rdev->dev, "regulator.%lu",
 		    (unsigned long) atomic_inc_return(&regulator_no));
-	ret = device_register(&rdev->dev);
-	if (ret != 0) {
-		put_device(&rdev->dev);
-		goto wash;
-	}
-
-	dev_set_drvdata(&rdev->dev, rdev);
 
 	/* set regulator constraints */
 	if (init_data)
@@ -3964,7 +3957,15 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
 
 	ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev, constraints);
 	if (ret < 0)
-		goto scrub;
+		goto wash;
+
+	ret = device_register(&rdev->dev);
+	if (ret != 0) {
+		put_device(&rdev->dev);
+		goto wash;
+	}
+
+	dev_set_drvdata(&rdev->dev, rdev);
 
 	if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
 		rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
@@ -3993,8 +3994,6 @@ out:
 
 unset_supplies:
 	unset_regulator_supplies(rdev);
-
-scrub:
 	regulator_ena_gpio_free(rdev);
 	device_unregister(&rdev->dev);
 	/* device core frees rdev */
@@ -4002,6 +4001,7 @@ scrub:
 	goto out;
 
 wash:
+	kfree(rdev->constraints);
 	regulator_ena_gpio_free(rdev);
 clean:
 	kfree(rdev);
-- 
2.5.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists