linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] scsi: rename SCSI_MAX_{SG, SG_CHAIN}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:42:19 +0300
From:	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To:	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
	Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Jej B <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] scsi: rename SCSI_MAX_{SG, SG_CHAIN}_SEGMENTS


>> <martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Ming" == Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org> writes:
>>>
>>> Ming> Are we ready to merge it?
>>>
>>> We're still missing an ack from Sagi.
>>
>> Thought we already had a ack from Bart.
>> OK, let's get one more from Sagi.
>
> Hmm ... this patch doesn't touch any code for which Sagi is the
> maintainer so I think my ack for the ib_srp changes is sufficient.

Indeed no need for my ack, but a review tag can't hurt ;)

Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>