linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/11] mm, compaction: Abstract compaction feedback to helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <570CE213.8050505@suse.cz>
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:54:59 +0200
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] mm, compaction: Abstract compaction feedback to
 helpers

On 04/11/2016 05:40 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Vlastimil has pointed out[1] that using compaction_withdrawn() for THP
> allocations has some non-trivial consequences. While I still think that
> the check is OK it is true we shouldn't sneak in a potential behavior
> change into something that basically provides an API. So can you fold
> the following partial revert into the original patch please?
>
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/570BB719.2030007@suse.cz
>
> ---
>  From 71ddeee4238e33d67ef07883e73f946a7cc40e73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:38:22 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] ction-abstract-compaction-feedback-to-helpers-fix
>
> Preserve the original thp back off checks to not introduce any
> functional changes as per Vlastimil.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>

Ack, thanks.