[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1460476375-27803-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 08:52:50 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
bobby.prani@...il.com, SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH memory-barriers.txt 2/7] documentation: Fix missed renaming: s/lock/acquire
From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
Terms `lock` and `unlock` have changed to `acquire` / `release` by
commit 2e4f5382d12a441b5cccfdde00308df15c2ce300 ("locking/doc: Rename
LOCK/UNLOCK to ACQUIRE/RELEASE"). However, the commit missed to change
the table of content. This commit changes the missed parts.
Also, section name `Acquiring functions` is not appropriate for the
section because the section is saying about lock in actual. This commit
changes the name to more appropriate name, `Lock acquisition functions`.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
Suggested-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index ec1289042396..38b1ce161afb 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -31,15 +31,15 @@ Contents:
(*) Implicit kernel memory barriers.
- - Locking functions.
+ - Lock acquisition functions.
- Interrupt disabling functions.
- Sleep and wake-up functions.
- Miscellaneous functions.
- (*) Inter-CPU locking barrier effects.
+ (*) Inter-CPU acquiring barrier effects.
- - Locks vs memory accesses.
- - Locks vs I/O accesses.
+ - Acquires vs memory accesses.
+ - Acquires vs I/O accesses.
(*) Where are memory barriers needed?
@@ -1859,7 +1859,7 @@ This is a variation on the mandatory write barrier that causes writes to weakly
ordered I/O regions to be partially ordered. Its effects may go beyond the
CPU->Hardware interface and actually affect the hardware at some level.
-See the subsection "Locks vs I/O accesses" for more information.
+See the subsection "Acquires vs I/O accesses" for more information.
===============================
@@ -1874,8 +1874,8 @@ provide more substantial guarantees, but these may not be relied upon outside
of arch specific code.
-ACQUIRING FUNCTIONS
--------------------
+LOCK ACQUISITION FUNCTIONS
+--------------------------
The Linux kernel has a number of locking constructs:
--
2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists