[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160412164428.GA1972@www.outflux.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:44:28 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] exec: clarify reasoning for euid/egid reset
This section of code initially looks redundant, but is required. This
improves the comment to explain more clearly why the reset is needed.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
fs/exec.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index c4010b8207a1..889221bbfdb3 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1387,7 +1387,12 @@ static void bprm_fill_uid(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
kuid_t uid;
kgid_t gid;
- /* clear any previous set[ug]id data from a previous binary */
+ /*
+ * Since this can be called multiple times (via prepare_binprm),
+ * we must clear any previous work done when setting set[ug]id
+ * bits from any earlier bprm->file uses (for example when run
+ * first for a script then for its interpreter).
+ */
bprm->cred->euid = current_euid();
bprm->cred->egid = current_egid();
--
2.6.3
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists