[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1460483357.2507.24.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:49:17 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc: Daniel Walker <danielwa@...co.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
"xe-kernel@...ernal.cisco.com" <xe-kernel@...ernal.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: checkpatch false positon on EXPORT_SYMBOL
> On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 13:59 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -3000,7 +3000,7 @@ sub process {
>
> $realline_next = $line_nr_next;
> if (defined $realline_next &&
> (!defined $lines[$realline_next - 1] ||
> - substr($lines[$realline_next - 1], $off_next) =~ /^\s*$/)) {
> + substr($lines[$realline_next - 1], $off_next) =~ /^($;|\s)*$/)) {
> $realline_next++;
> }
This doesn't work with c99 comments like:
int foo; // comment
EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo); // comment
but then again, there aren't any uses like that in the
kernel tree so it almost certainly doesn't matter.
Thanks Andy.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists